<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud Definitions: NIST, Gartner, Forrester</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cloudenterprise.info/2009/08/04/cloud-definitions-nist-gartner-forrester/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cloudenterprise.info/2009/08/04/cloud-definitions-nist-gartner-forrester/</link>
	<description>Cloud Computing and SaaS for the Enterprise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Coote</title>
		<link>http://cloudenterprise.info/2009/08/04/cloud-definitions-nist-gartner-forrester/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Coote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloudenterprise.info/?p=287#comment-574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I prefer Berkeley&#039;s definition in &quot;Above the Clouds&quot;, which specifically draws attention to the &quot;pay as you go with no upfront commitment/sunk costs&quot; model, which therefore scopes out the oxymoron of &quot;private cloud&quot;.

My reasoning is that &quot;private cloud&quot; is a defensive position set up by vested interests (IT shops and vendors), which just layers on extra costs over and above the current bloated wastage in IT assets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I prefer Berkeley&#8217;s definition in &#8220;Above the Clouds&#8221;, which specifically draws attention to the &#8220;pay as you go with no upfront commitment/sunk costs&#8221; model, which therefore scopes out the oxymoron of &#8220;private cloud&#8221;.</p>
<p>My reasoning is that &#8220;private cloud&#8221; is a defensive position set up by vested interests (IT shops and vendors), which just layers on extra costs over and above the current bloated wastage in IT assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

