CloudEnterprise.info

No real private clouds yet?

Posted by: Dmitry Sotnikov on: January 16, 2009

private-cloudHere I continue the 2009 predictions series started with my IaaS/PaaS 2009 post.

In the world of cloud computing we are living in very exciting times. Cloud Computing is the buzz word of the day even though the segment is barely two years old. Interest in private clouds is even more astonishing considering that these barely exist at all and we are likely to be only entering the first days of real developments in this area.

In a nutshell, private clouds are Amazon-like cost-effective and scalable infrastructures but run by companies themselves within their firewalls.

There are a couple of reasons why this is an interesting option for a lot of enterprises out there:

  1. Some data and systems belong on premise due to security and legal concerns, or simply companies wanting to stay in control.
  2. The story of not having to provision and manage hardware resources when using public clouds from Amazon and others sounds great but the reality is that enterprises already have hardware of their own. Instead of tearing down datacenters in which they have been investing all these years – why not start to use them more efficiently?

These are the reasons why both enterprise and government structures (you don’t expect Department of Defense to use Amazon for their apps, do you?) are very interested in pursuing the private cloud option, and analysts like Gartner are giving the concept their high blessing.

Surprisingly enough, I would argue that no real solution is currently obvious on the market.

VMware is working on their Datacenter OS and vCloud initiatives, and has had LabManager offering for a long time. Microsoft is obviously happy sell you their Hyper-V and Systems Center Virtual Machine Manager. And then there are quite a few startups like 3Tera (grid operating system), ParaScale (disk-storage aggregation software), Cassatt (resource-pooling technology), Elastra (cloud-like application management inside a company’s firewall) and so on.

However, I believe that the real solution is yet to come.

Here are the key characteristics that private clouds should have from my perspective:

  1. More than a hypervisor and VM management tool: storage services, standard scalability APIs such as load balancing and queuing, and so on.
  2. Unified approach with public clouds: APIs, software stack, licensing, virtual machine formats (in case of IaaS), development tools…

Unified public/private approach is important for a few reasons:

  • It would provide for scenarios like outbursting (using internal clouds most of the time and public ones for peak loads) and freedom to go to external vendors and back.
  • From development perspective, ability to write application once and sell it both as SaaS offering from a public cloud and software one for private deployments will stimulate software vendors to create solutions for the platform.
  • And obviously the more unified the technology gets the easier it would be for in-house developers and IT to have skills necessary to develop and manage applications of their own.

There are companies working on elements of private cloud systems of the future but there is nothing close to being a real solution with Amazon-like acceptance (still curious to see what happens to Eucalyptus in 09 by the way).

Will 2009 be the year when private clouds really take off? I seriously doubt so – there seems to be a lot of work ahead to make this a reality. However, there definitely is demand (for the reasons I mentioned above), analysts’ blessing, and a lot companies rushing in to deliver a solution. Which means that no matter how early things are we will see a lot of interest developments in this area in 2009.

Technorati Tags:
,

3 Responses to "No real private clouds yet?"

AT&T and the like can easily do fully private clouds on an NPLS network with total virtualized everything from server farms to firewalls.

Karl,

There’s definitely some terminology confusion here. What you are talking about is a datacenter vendor (in your case, AT&T), leasing to you a part of their datacenter and probably setting up VPN or something to make it appear as part of your network.

What I mean by private cloud is a completely different thing:

I am talking about companies wanting to use the hardware they have in their own datacenter and put some kind of “cloud OS” on top of that so their can have the flexibility and scalability that Amazon and other are getting but within their physical network under their control.

There’s a lot of the former – but not so much of the latter yet.

Dmitry

[...] in which he referenced and lauded Dimitry Sotnikov’s blog of the same titled “No Real Private Clouds Yet?“ I continue to scratch my head not because of David’s statements that he’s yet [...]

Leave a Reply



View Dmitry Sotnikov's profile on LinkedIn


Follow Dmitry Sotnikov at Twitter

My Recent Tweets

Blogroll

RSS Virtualization.info

RSS SaaS @ ZDNet

RSS Russian Azure blog

Legal

The posts on this blog are provided “as is” with no warranties and confer no rights. The opinions expressed on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer Quest Software or anyone else for that matter. All trademarks acknowledged.

© 2008 Dmitry Sotnikov